Background: Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in children could impact speech processing along different levels of the auditory pathway; subcortical and cortical. The most frequently used psychoacoustic tests for temporal resolution and ordering evaluation are Gaps-In-Noise (GIN) and Pitch Pattern Sequence (PPS) tests. Moreover, speech-evoked auditory brainstem response (speech-ABR) represents an electrophysiologic test of brainstem speech processing. Aim: to study the impact of mild to moderate SNHL on speech neural encoding in school-aged children, using psychoacoustic (GIN and PPS) and electrophysiological (speech-ABR) tests and to estimate the accuracy of the psychoacoustic and electrophysiological tests in the diagnosis of temporal processing deficit. Methods: This observational, case-control study involved 30 school-aged children who were classified into; control group of normal-hearing children and study group of 20 children with mild to moderate SNHL. They were subjected to history-data reporting, basic audiological testing, and both psychoacoustic and electrophysiologic evaluation of the temporal auditory processing. Results: In comparison to the control group, there were significantly higher approximate threshold (APT) measure of GIN test in the moderate SNHL subgroups, lower total correct score measure of GIN test at a lower (mild) degree of SNHL, lower PPS scores as the hearing threshold increased above normal, and longer speech-ABR latency in the moderate SNHL subgroup. All the examined measures revealed a high accuracy with the APT measure of the GIN test showing the highest accuracy (92%). Conclusions: The psychoacoustic and electrophysiologic evaluation provided evidence of temporal auditory processing impairment in children with SNHL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khater et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: