Vibration analysis is highly beneficial in a variety of engineering areas. However, in many real-world applications, vibration data acquisition may be challenging due to the accessibility of the desired sensor locations. It can be also costly if many measurement points are required. Consequently, a few vibration estimation methods have been proposed, which are referred to as “virtual sensing”. Virtual sensing claims to be able to replace a physical sensor with a virtual one, whose signal should closely resemble the signal from the physical sensor if it was placed at the same location. The signal from such a virtual sensor is estimated based on a numerical model of the structure under test and data from a number of physical sensors. In this study, the well-known modal expansion and decomposition-based virtual sensing method is examined, and its sensitivity to the amount and location of physical sensors is explored. Two sensor placement scenarios are considered: (i) the most common scenario where the physical sensors are placed in the nodes of a regular mesh, and (ii) where the sensors configuration is generated by the optimal sensors placement (OSP) algorithm. The experimental examination is performed on a simple test structure (rectangular aluminum plate) using time and frequency domain performance indicators for three excitation profiles (pseudo-random, burst pseudorandom, and sinusoidal). The results demonstrate that the use of OSP significantly improves the performance of virtual sensing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bourdalos et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: