11511 Background: Sarcomas are heterogeneous mesenchymal malignancies often with few treatment options and poor outcomes. ATRX is commonly altered in sarcoma, with loss-of-function (LOF) mutations observed in up to 35% of cases. ATRX plays roles in DNA damage response, telomere maintenance, and epigenetic regulation. However, the impact of ATRX loss on sarcoma biology and the potential of ATRX mutation to serve as a prognostic biomarker in sarcoma are under investigation. Methods: The predominant alteration seen in ATRX in sarcoma is LOF mutation, thus tumor specimens were scored for presence or absence of ATRX staining by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in clinically-annotated tissue microarrays (TMAs) including 95 patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS), 127 with soft tissue leiomyosarcoma (STLMS), 82 with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), and 84 with well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (WD/DDLPS). We also performed IHC staining using a panel of immune cell markers and checkpoints on the ULMS TMA, including CD8, CD20, CD68, PDL1, CTLA4, CD47, and CD163, among others. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log rank tests were used to assess the impact of ATRX loss on overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and progression free survival (PFS). Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to determine whether ATRX loss is an independent predictor of survival. T tests, ANOVA, and Chi squared tests were used to test for association between ATRX loss and immune markers in the ULMS TMA. Results: ATRX loss was seen in 14.1% of STLMS (n = 18), 52.6% of ULMS (n = 50), 36.6% of UPS (n = 30), and 8.3% of WD/DDLPS (n = 7). In univariate analysis, ATRX loss was associated with significantly worse OS (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.31-0.80, p = 0.004) and PFS (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.33-0.81, p = 0.004) in ULMS, worse DSS in UPS (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.95, p = 0.03), and worse PFS in WD/DDLPS (HR 0.13, 95% CI 0.02-0.73, p = 0.02). In multivariate analyses, ATRX loss was also associated with worse OS and PFS in ULMS and worse DSS in UPS. In ULMS, ATRX loss was associated with increased density of CD8+ T cells (p = 0.01), PDL1 expression (p = 0.03), CTLA4 expression (p = 0.049), IDO-positive tumor cells (p = 0.01), and CD163-positive cells (p = 0.003). Conclusions: ATRX loss is associated with worse outcomes in ULMS, UPS, and WD/DDLPS. ATRX loss is also associated with a distinct immune microenvironment in ULMS characterized by T cell exhaustion and immunosuppressive M2 macrophages. Future work will focus on understanding the molecular underpinnings of these associations and potential ways to exploit these findings therapeutically.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: