Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Maxillary and mandibular molars exhibit morphological variations in root and canal number, resulting in a higher incidence of missed canals during treatment. The drawbacks of periapical radiographs during diagnosis led to special interest in CBCT use. Aim: Evaluate morphological variations in first and second maxillary molars and first mandibular molars in an Egyptian population using CBCT scans in-vivo. Materials and Methods: CBCT scans of 105 patients scheduled for RCT (first maxillary molar n=35, second maxillary molar n=35, first mandibular molar n=35) were selected from MIU`s dental clinics complex for detailed morphological analysis. Results: The study found that all examined maxillary first molars showed three roots, with 74.3% having four root canals and 25.7% having three. The mesio-buccal root predominantly displayed type II Vertucci configuration, followed by type IV, type I, and type V. The distobuccal and palatal roots typically had type I configuration. Upper second molars showed varying root and canal numbers, with 88.5% having three roots and 48.6% having either three or four canals. Type I was the most common Vertucci configuration in the mesiobuccal root. All examined mandibular first molars mostly had two roots, with 54.3% having four canals and 45.7% having three. Type IV was the most prevalent configuration in the mesial root, while type I was common in the distal root and Radix Entomolaris. Conclusion: The study reveals morphological variations in maxillary and mandibular molars in the Egyptian population. Pre-evaluating root canal morphology using CBCT imaging enhances endodontic therapy outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taher et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: