7079 Background: R-CHOP is the primary treatment for gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (GDLBCL); for localized disease, the role of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) after chemotherapy remains underexplored. This study focuses on localized GDLBCL undergoing a combined modality therapy of R-CHOP followed by gastric RT, comparing outcomes between those receiving short-course (3-4 cycles) and full-course (6 cycles) R-CHOP. Methods: A retrospective analysis identified 50 consecutive PGDLBCL pts treated with R-CHOP followed by RT between 1/2000-1/2021. Baseline characteristics and follow-up data were collected. Lugano PET criteria and endoscopy (EGD) assessed overall response rate. Kaplan-Meier and univariable cox regression models estimated overall survival (OS) and (PFS). Results: Of the 50 pts with localized (Stage I-II) disease, 34 (68%) received 3-4 cycles of R-CHOP and 16 (32%) received 6 cycles. Pre-RT disease evaluation varied, with 36 (72%) undergoing EGD and PET, 4 (8%) EGD and CT, and 6 (12%) PET alone. One pt (3%) exhibited active DLBCL post 3-4 cycle R-CHOP, while 5 (31%) did so after 6 cycles (p=0.1). Median time from last R-CHOP dose to RT start date was 1.2 months with a median 3060 cGy delivered dose for both groups (range 2340-3060 in the 3-4 cycle group, 3000-4500 in the 6-cycle group). Median follow-up time from RT end is 58 months. No in-field failures occurred post-complete response (CR); however, 1 pt did not achieve a CR following R-CHOP and RT, progressing in the stomach and subsequently at new, out-of-field (OOF) sites. 3 pts had OOF progression without relapses in the stomach in a median time of 21 months. Low-grade lymphoma in the stomach post-DLBCL CR was observed in 2 pts, 3 and 22 months from RT end, with 1 OOF marginal zone lymphoma 2 years-post RT. OS and PFS did not significantly differ between the 3-4 and 6 cycle groups (96-month OS 70% vs. 86%, p=0.8; 96-month PFS 76% vs. 86%, p=0.7). OS and DLBCL PFS were analyzed for pts with evidence of residual DLBCL pre-RT compared to those without evidence of disease after R-CHOP. The 24-month DLBCL PFS was 92% in the CR group and 67% for those with incomplete response (p=0.14), with 92% and 67% 24-month survival probability (p=0.11). On univariate analysis, pre-RT evidence of active DLBCL by PET and/or EGD, pre-RT PET FDG uptake, and achieving CR on first-post-RT imaging were not statistically significant for DLBCL PFS. Conclusions: Recognizing the limitations of a retrospective study, our study documents the effectiveness of short-course R-CHOP followed by RT in localized GDLBCL, with similar outcomes to the full 6-cycle regimen. Excellent disease control was observed, with few instances of DLBCL or low-grade lymphoma relapse. Further analysis will include a cohort receiving R-CHOP alone without consolidative RT. This analysis aims to contribute to the evolving standard of care for GDLBCL, providing insights for future treatment strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fregonese et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: