Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
e16219 Background: No reliable biomarkers or risk factors guide treatment selection in HCC patients. Management is typically institution-specific, and compliance with the available guidelines is low. Our retrospective review aims to identify HCC patients suitable for TARE. Methods: HCC patients treated with TARE between 1/1/2015 and 8/30/22 at Ohio State University were included in this study. Patient-related information was extracted from chart review. Various risk factors (related to HCC and TARE) were compared between good (GR) and poor (PR) responders (progression-free survival (PFS) ≤ vs. > median (m)), and good (GSv) and poor (PSv) survivors (overall survival (OS) ≤ vs. > m). Chi-square test and logistic regression were performed using JMP Pro 17 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Results: Our cohort included 141 patients. The median age was 65 years (range 49-88), 80% were males and 80% were White (16% were African American and 4% were other). The median OS and PFS were 9 months (m) (95% confidence interval [CI], 5-22.5) and 4m (95% CI, 2-9), respectively. Compared to PSv (OS ≤ 9m, N = 71), the GSv group (OS > 9m, N = 70) had a high alcohol history (hx) (64% vs. 44%, p = 0.01); less baseline (BL) encephalopathy (Enc) (21% vs. 37%, p = 0.04) and post-TARE ascites (As) (31% vs. 63%, p = 0.001); were able to receive immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (44% vs. 6%, p < 0.001) before (6% vs. 1%) or after (39% vs. 10%) TARE. Other key BL features with a trend to significance (p = 0.06-0.08) were less BL cirrhosis (69% vs. 87%) and As (19% vs. 34%), hx of HCC treatment (systemic or local, 43% vs, 28%), and ability to get second TARE (19% vs. 8%). In worse survivors (PFS ≤ 5m, N = 40), post-TARE As (65% vs. 41%, p = 0.008) was significantly higher. Only 2/40 patients were able to get ICI (95% vs. 37%, p = 0.0002) in this group. Compared to PR, the GR group (PFS > 5m, N = 64) had a higher rate of diabetes mellitus (DM) (45% vs. 26%, p = 0.02) and less post-TARE As (34% vs. 58%, p = 0.004). BL and HCC-related factors prominently NOT featured in these comparisons were hepatitis (B or C) or smoking hx and macrovascular invasion. Conclusions: TARE suits patients with hx of alcohol use or DM, no BL Enc, As, or cirrhosis, and failed prior lines. Post-TARE As is poor prognostic markers. ICI use will improve the outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Das et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: