Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 1, 2024Journal of Clinical Oncology

Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between PG-SGA criteria with survival of cancer patients.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MYMin YuTDTingting DaiXLXuemei Li

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Yu et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e67050b6db6435875fa653https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.e23277
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Value of the modified Patient‐Generated Subjective Global Assessment in indicating the need for nutrition intervention and predicting overall survival in patients with malignant tumors in at least two organs2024 · 5 citations
  3. 3Real-world nutritional outcomes assessed by subjective global assessment in community oncology practice in western India.2026
  4. 4Nutritional status of cancer outpatients using scored patient generated subjective global assessment in two cancer treatment centers, Nairobi, Kenya2017 · 28 citations
  5. 5Evaluation of the on-diagnosis nutritional status of patients with gastric cancer via different nutritional assessment tools and their association with three-year mortality2024