Introduction N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels have been shown to be reliable in diagnosing heart failure. Studies have postulated higher NT-proBNP levels with lower left ventricular ejection fraction and higher in-hospital mortality, necessitating more aggressive interventions and management. This study describes the association between NT-proBNP and ejection fraction and their utility as predictors of in-hospital mortality. Methods We evaluated the medical records of patients admitted for heart failure between January 2021 and January 2023 in a tertiary hospital. Pearson-r was used to determine the association between NT-proBNP and ejection fraction. In-hospital mortality was assessed using logistic regression analysis and odds ratio for dichotomous variables. Results Of the 147 medical records reviewed, 53.74% were female, the mean age was 64.9 ± 13.5years with ages ranging from 24 to 90 years, average NT-proBNP levels were 5791.3 pg/mL ± 3779.1, and average left ventricular ejection fraction was 49.9% ± 15.1. No age (p=.315) and sex (p=.626) distribution difference was observed. Patients with a higher NT-proBNP quartile had significantly higher systolic (p=0.023) and diastolic blood pressure (p=0.015), worse NYHA functional class (p=0.000), higher creatinine levels (p=0.000), and prevalence of diabetes mellitus (p=0.014). There was a significant difference between the levels of ejection fraction across NT-proBNP quartiles (p<0.03), mortality rates were higher across NT-proBNP quartiles, and NT-proBNP levels and ejection fraction were not predictors of mortality, but a worse NYHA functional class II and III predicted mortality. Conclusion High levels of NT-proBNP are linked to lower left ventricular ejection fraction and higher in-hospital mortality rates. In light of this study’s findings, we recommend NT-proBNP as part of the assessment for prediction of in-hospital mortality in heart failure patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paulino et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: