Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article reports experiences and challenges connected with Ghana’s Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) programme and its implications for grant access and impacts on recipients’ well-being. Engaging with the administrative burden’s framework, we find that inadequate information; transport, timing and financial barriers to accessing payments; irregularity of payments; electronic payment difficulties; gift giving to programme administrators; and lack of access to complementary services are the key administrative challenges watering down the LEAP impacts on recipients’ well-being. We recommend establishing an appropriate information delivery system, feedback and monitoring mechanisms, providing other productivity-enhancing services to complement the LEAP grant, strengthening the local implementation structures and payment procedures and reducing travel costs and waiting time for service delivery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osei et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: