This study presents a primary batch of results for an ongoing extensive experimental program related to protein based foamed concrete. Compressive strength is herein investigated as a function of dry density, water content, curing conditions, cement type and, most importantly, foaming agents (employed in the cement paste). Structural Foamed Concrete (SFC) was investigated using a fixed water/cement ratio, CEM I-52.5 N cement, wet-burlap (23 ± 3°C) curing conditions, variable polypropylene fiber content (calculated as a percentage of cement content). Initially, three different foaming protein-based agents were utilized/tested, prior to selecting the agent yielding the highest concrete compressive strength; the latter agent continued as a fixed parameter in the current investigation. This experimental study comprises ninety six (96) foamed concrete specimens with a dry density ranging from 1500 to 1600 kg/m3. The different polypropylene fiber percentages were investigated to enhance the compressive and tensile strength/properties. Results showed that the optimal polypropylene fiber – cement content based (by weight) - dose of 0.3% yields a 32% increase and 27% increase for compressive and tensile strength, respectively. Furthermore, on utilizing the outcomes of the material testing program – for a hypothetical cost analysis study related to a seven-storey building of 400 m2 footprint – a 3 % construction cost reduction is obtained; noting that significant energy savings are anticipated on using foamcrete for slab elements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassaan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: