Vector-borne pathogens continue to emerge, kill and harm humans with unrelenting regularity. Conventional strategies to controlling insect vectors grew out of the military; communication is hierarchical, responses unilateral, and regulation predetermined. We developed an alternative approach, modeled after the adaptive immune system, and compared the approaches through a cluster-randomized trial in the context of an ongoing urban Chagas disease vector control campaign in Arequipa, Peru. We report here early results from a pre-planned interim analysis. In the intervention (immune) arm 23 infested households were detected in 10 separate foci; in the control arm 5 infested households were detected in 1 focus. The immune approach was adaptive and required more effort (1085.2 person days vs 864.2 in the control; Rate ratio 3.66 [1.35 12.38], p-value =0.0062). Vector surveillance approaches modeled after the immune system may be more effective than conventional approaches, especially in cities and other complex civilian environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levy et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: