Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Pronated foot potentially induces alterations in lower limb kinetics, influencing gait patterns and elevating energy expenditure.Nevertheless, a comprehensive understanding of the connection between pronated foot and other static alignment factors remains lacking.Therefore, this study aimed to establish correlations between pronated foot and pelvic inclination, femoral anteversion, Q-angle, tibial torsion, and talus head position.Method: This observational study involved 100 individuals of all genders, aged 18-30, with a Foot Posture Index (FPI) score of +6 or higher.Outcome measure evaluations were performed for pelvic inclination, femoral anteversion, Q-angle, tibial torsion, and talus head position.SPSS 25.0 software was used to analyze the correlation between the FPI score and all variables, employing Pearson's correlation and one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey tests.Results: FPI exhibited a significant positive correlation with the Q-angle (r=0.267,p=0.007), while correlations with other variables were nonsignificant.Strong positive correlations were observed between tibial torsion and talus head position (r=0.696,p=0.000).Notable differences were identified between FPI scores of 6-8 and 9-10/11-12 across these variables using one-way ANOVA.A regression model utilizing Q-angle as a predictor revealed a statistically significant relationship with FPI (R=0.267,p<0.05).Conclusion: The study revealed significant connection between FPI and Q-angle, indicating possible link between foot posture and lower limb alignment.However, while certain alignment factors showed significant differences across FPI score groups, others didn't exhibit
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tyagi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: