In the Mobile Adhoc Network, the most predominant parameter is End to End Delay which supports the network performance as well as efficiency of the communication. Many studies have been conducted to overcome packet delay in nodes by designing routing protocols using cutting-edge approaches, but the research has not progressed. Existing routing strategies select paths by dynamically manipulating various parameters, which adds overhead to the routing protocol. This article focuses on developing a new strategy for overcoming packet delay in Mobile Adhoc Networks with the use of a delay table and delay calculation nodes. The simulation was performed using NS2.34, and the results were compared to AODV in terms of performance metrics such as PDR, END and throughput, revealing that the proposed work achieved a PDR of 90% to 98%. In contrast, normal AODV had a packet delivery ratio of 70% to 90%. End-to-end delay was 0.083 to 0.77%, compared to the old routing protocol AODV's delay of 0.186 to 1.08ms, and throughput was 94 to 99% higher.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hemalatha et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: