In this article we report on an exploration of leadership and context for the improvement of quality education in South African socioeconomic-deprived school contexts viewed through Hellinger’s contextual theory, open systems theory, Bronfenbrenner’s ecology of human development, and Bourdieu’s theory of field, habitus and power. A post positivistic approach allowed for a quantitative research design which employed an interpretivist lens to use the theory and the context to interpret the numbers. A self-designed questionnaire was used for the data collection. We analysed the data by means of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) analysis program and evaluated using a Likert scale. In the study reported on here, the mean scores – sorted from the highest, which means the most important factor, to the lowest – are presented. The findings reveal that low teacher professionalism and non-compliance to the regulations, contextual factors outside the schools (teenage pregnancy, vandalism), learners’ circumstantial challenges, high accountability by the department without considering schools’ contextual factors, and a lack of parental involvement in the teaching-learning process were among the biggest challenges for principals to influence quality education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heystek et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: