Central air conditioning systems of buildings and structures are significant consumers of electric and thermal energy of different temperature levels and are the least economical in terms of energy consumption. When designing these systems, due attention is not always paid to assessing their energy efficiency and no variant design is carried out with a comparison of the relevant indicators. This is due to the lack of proven engineering methods. The exergy method of analysing energy-consuming systems provides a correct numerical assessment of energy efficiency and enables a comparative analysis of circuit solutions and system elements. In contrast to the energy method, the peculiarity of the exergy method in relation to air conditioning systems is the possibility of taking into account all available mass and energy flows in the system in exergy units. The extension of the exergy method to systems for creating and maintaining a microclimate in buildings and structures has not yet acquired the status of practical engineering support. This article presents an example of an exergy analysis based on the original methodology for comparing methods of humidification in a central air conditioning system for a public building in order to select the best method in terms of energy efficiency. Two traditional methods of air humidification for the cold season - adiabatic and isothermal - were used for the study and comparison. The results of analytical studies are presented in the form of relative values of exergy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zadoiannyi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: