Wearable continuous gait phase estimation is essential for walking assistance, clinical rehabilitation, and clinical assessment; however, most algorithms have only been validated for straight-line and constant-speed walking, and it is unclear how performance will change in real-life locomotion scenarios. A generalized paradigm is needed to comprehensively assess and recommend wearable continuous gait phase estimation strategies for the diverse array of walking situations. We thus propose a comprehensive evaluation indicator system for eight typical gait activities in daily life including slow walking, standard walking, running, walking with turns, stair descent, stair ascent, stop-and-go, and uneven terrain walking. The indicator system was used to evaluate four commonly used continuous gait phase estimation strategies: adaptive oscillators, phase oscillator, neural network, and time-based estimation. Eleven healthy participants were enrolled in the evaluation. All estimation strategies performed well for constant-speed walking but performance varied for other activities. Time-based estimation was most accurate for slow walking (0.094±0.011 rad root mean square error, 1.50±0.18% of one gait cycle), running (0.167±0.028 rad, 2.66±0.44%) and walking with turns (0.124±0.047 rad, 2.00±0.75%). Adaptive oscillators were most accurate for standard walking (0.115±0.037 rad, 1.83±0.59%). Phase oscillator was most accurate for stair climbing (0.280±0.063 rad, 4.46±1.00%) and uneven terrain (0.204±0.069 rad, 4.30±1.10%). Neural network was most accurate for stop-and-go (0.27±0.114 rad, 4.30±1.81%). These results can potentially provide guidance for determining suitable gait phase estimation strategies in realistic locomotion scenarios, and in comparing and optimizing the current proposed strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: