PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 30, 2024Journal of Arrhythmology2 citationsOpen Access

Interatrial block and abnormal P-wave electrocardiographic parameters as non-invasive predictors of atrial fibrillation

View Full Paper
TVT. G. VaikhanskayaTKT. M. KaptiukhIKI. D. Kozlov

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Aim. To identify noninvasive markers of atrial electrical dysfunction and risk of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and to develop a predictive mathematical model to estimate the AF risk based on electrocardiographic (ECG) P-wave parameters during sinus rhythm. Methods. The study included 211 patients with cardiovascular pathology (aged median 62 52; 71 years, 67.8% male, NYHA heart failure class I-III). All patients (follow-up median 45 26; 67 months) underwent a complex of studies: 12-lead ECG, echocardiography, 24-hour ECG monitoring. Based on surface ECG data during sinus rhythm, parameters of atrial electrical activation were assessed such as Morphology, Voltage and P waves duration (MVP) according to integral analysis by MVP score. Results. During 3.7-year period, 44 (20.8%) patients experienced new-onset sustained AF and 12 (5.69%) patients developed ischemic stroke. As a result of ROC analysis and univariate Cox regression, independent predictors of AF were identified: P-wave prolongation in the DII lead, 3rd degree or advanced interatrial block (aIAB), an increase P-wave terminal force in lead V 1 (PTFV 1 ), low-voltage P-wave in the DI lead and сalculated level of abnormal P-wave ≥3 points on the MVP score. Data from multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis confirmed the prognostic significance for three independent predictors of AF: aIAB (hazard ratio (HR) 5.92; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.48-4.12; p=0.0001); PTFV 1 (HR 1.14; 95% CI 1.04-1.24, p=0.003); low-voltage P-wave in lead DI <0.1 mV (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.02-1.05; p=0.0001); and as a result a mathematical model was created to predict AF risk (-2LL =258; χ 2 =105; p=0.0001). Predictors such as PTFV 1 (HR 1.41; 95% CI 1.17-1.72, p=0.0001) and MVP score of abnormal P-waves (HR 1.85; 95% CI 1.27-1.72 2.70], p=0.001) were associated with a high risk of stroke according to Cox regression model (-2LL= 62.5; χ 2 =38.4; p <0.001). Conclusion. Complex of ECG markers of atrial electrical dysfunction such as aIAB, PTFV 1 , level MVP score of abnormal P-wave and low P-wave voltage allows identifying patients at high risk of AF and ischemic stroke.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vaikhanskaya et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e67a8cb6db643587604685https://doi.org/10.35336/va-1329
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of P‐wave indices in prediction of atrial fibrillation—Insight from loop recorder analysis2021 · 33 citations
  2. 2Electrocardiographic predictors of atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke2021 · 9 citations
  3. 3Risk Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Based on Electrocardiographic Interatrial Block2018 · 77 citations
  4. 4ECG predictors of AF: a systematic review (Predicting AF in Ischaemic Stroke-PrAFIS)2023
  5. 5Orthogonal P-wave morphology, conventional P-wave indices, and the risk of atrial fibrillation in the general population using data from the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register2020 · 46 citations