Key result
Abnormal P-wave indices linked to ~5.3-fold higher risk of incident AF.
Why the study?
Previous studies linking P-wave indices to AF were limited in reliably diagnosing AF episodes, which implantable loop recorders can detect continuously.
Do P-wave indices predict the first detection of atrial fibrillation in patients with implantable loop recorders?
Cohort (n=366)
Yes
Do P-wave indices predict the first detection of atrial fibrillation in patients with implantable loop recorders?
Hazard Ratio: 5.3 (95% CI 3.249–8.636)
p-value: p=<0.001
Simple ECG P-wave indices can independently predict the development of atrial fibrillation in patients with implantable loop recorders, enabling effective risk stratification.
May aid AF risk stratification in loop recorder patients; extends predictors but leaves open prospective validation.
Background Several P‐wave indices are associated with the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, previous studies have been limited in their ability to reliably diagnose episodes of AF. Implantable loop recorders allow long‐term, continuous, and therefore more reliable detection of AF. Hypothesis The aim of this study is to identify and evaluate ECG parameters for predicting AF by analyzing patients with loop recorders. Methods This study included 366 patients (mean age 62 ± 16 years, mean LVEF 61 ± 6%, 175 women) without AF who underwent loop recorder implantation between 2010–2020. Patients were followed up on a 3 monthly outpatient interval. Results During a follow‐up of 627 ± 409 days, 75 patients (20%) reached the primary study end point (first detection of AF). Independent predictors of AF were as follows: age ≥68 years (hazard risk [HR], 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.668–4.235; p < .001), P‐wave amplitude in II <0.1 mV (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.298–3.441; p = .003), P‐wave terminal force in V 1 ≤ −4000 µV × ms (HR, 5.3; 95% CI, 3.249–8.636; p < .001, and advanced interatrial block (HR, 5.01; 95% CI, 2.638–9.528; p < .001). Our risk stratification model based on these independent predictors separated patients into 4 groups with high (70%), intermediate high (41%), intermediate low (18%), and low (4%) rates of AF. Conclusions Our study indicated that P‐wave indices are suitable for predicting AF episodes. Furthermore, it is possible to stratify patients into risk groups for AF using simple ECG parameters, which is particularly important for patients with cryptogenic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kreimer et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (n=366). P-wave indices (e.g., P-wave terminal force in V1 ≤ -4000 µV × ms) vs. Absence of specific P-wave abnormalities was evaluated on First detection of atrial fibrillation (HR 5.3, 95% CI 3.249-8.636, p=<0.001). Specific P-wave indices, including P-wave terminal force in V1 ≤ -4000 µV × ms (HR 5.3) and advanced interatrial block (HR 5.01), were strong independent predictors for the first detection of atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: