Randomized crossover trial demonstrates noninferior oxygen saturation with auto-demand delivery in nocturnal hypoxemia patients, indicating reliable nocturnal safety.
Abstract The newly developed portable oxygen concentrator with an auto-demand oxygen delivery system (auto-DODS) automatically switches between 3 sensitivities according to the negative pressure gradient of inhalation and supplies oxygen only during inhalation. The aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness and safety of auto-demand devices compared with a continuous flow oxygen concentrator, during sleep, in a randomized crossover noninferiority trial. We alternatively used an auto-DODS or a continuous-flow oxygen concentrator, all night on separate days for HOT (Home Oxygen Therapy) patients with nocturnal hypoxemic symptoms. The primary endpoints were the mean value of oxygen saturation (SpO₂) over the total sleep time. The secondary endpoints included the efficacy endpoints and the safety endpoints. Regarding the primary endpoint, the difference in SpO₂ between the auto-DODS and continuous flow was 0.835%. Since the upper limit of this difference did not exceed 2.8, which was set as the noninferiority margin, it was shown that the auto-DODS did not reduce SpO₂ by at least 2.8% on average compared to continuous flow. No equipment failure or exacerbation of disease was observed, confirming the safety of the auto-DODS during the night.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yatani et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: