We show that incompatible ``higher-order quantum theoretic testing procedures", known as quantum testers, perform better in distinguishing causal quantum networks than its compatible counterparts. To demonstrate our finding, we consider a specific two-party quantum comb discrimination (QCD) game based on the task in which a receiver gets a black-box that implements a quantum comb and they attempt to determine which comb it implements based on prior information. We show that the receiver does better at winning the game when they have exclusive access to incompatible testers over compatible ones. Our investigation generalises the earlier finding that the incompatibility of POVMs is a { bona fide} resource in quantum state distinguishability. We also show that any quantum resource in testers is useful in comb exclusion tasks using the resource measure, { convex weight}.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ragini et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: