Neural radiance fields (NeRF) are a groundbreaking computer vision technology that enables the generation of high-quality, immersive visual content from multiple viewpoints. This capability holds significant advantages for applications such as virtual/augmented reality, 3D modelling and content creation for the film and entertainment industry. However, the evaluation of NeRF methods poses several challenges, including a lack of comprehensive datasets, reliable assessment methodologies, and objective quality metrics. This paper addresses the problem of NeRF quality assessment thoroughly, by conducting a rigorous subjective quality assessment test that considers several scene classes and recently proposed NeRF view synthesis methods. Additionally, the performance of a wide range of state-of-the-art conventional and learning-based full-reference 2D image and video quality assessment metrics is evaluated against the subjective scores of the subjective study. The experimental results are analyzed in depth, providing a comparative evaluation of several NeRF methods and objective quality metrics, across different classes of visual scenes, including real and synthetic content for front-face and 360-degree camera trajectories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: