Deep neural networks (DNNs) are widely employed across various domains, with their training costs making them crucial assets for model owners. However, the rise of Machine Learning as a Service has made models more accessible, but also increases the risk of leakage. Attackers can successfully steal models through internal leaks or API access, emphasizing the critical importance of protecting intellectual property. Several watermarking methods have been proposed, embedding secret watermarks of model owners into models. However, watermarking requires tampering with the model's training process to embed the watermark, which may lead to a decrease in utility. Recently, some fingerprinting techniques have emerged to generate fingerprint samples near the classification boundary to detect pirated models. Nevertheless, these methods lack distance constraints and suffer from high training costs. To address these issues, we propose to utilize conditional generative network to generate fingerprint data points, enabling a better exploration of the model's decision boundary. By incorporating margin loss during GAN training, we can control the distance between generated data points and classification boundary to ensure the robustness and uniqueness of our method. Moreover, our method does not require additional training of proxy models, enhancing the efficiency of fingerprint acquisition. To validate the effectiveness of our approach, we evaluate it on CIFAR-10 and Tiny-ImageNet, considering three types of model extraction attacks, fine-tuning, pruning, and transfer learning attacks. The results demonstrate that our method achieves ARUC values of 0.186 and 0.153 on CIFAR-10 and Tiny-ImageNet datasets, respectively, representing a remarkable improvement of 400% and 380% compared to the current leading baseline. The source code is available at https://github.com/wason981/MarginFinger.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: