Guided by existing brand-activism literature, this study investigates the rising phenomenon of brands taking a public stance on controversial issues to advocate for societal changes. Based on one-on-one, in-depth interviews, this study delineates the conceptual differences between brand activism and corporate social responsibility (CSR), proposes a new conceptualization of brand activism, and explicates consumers' responses to brand activism acts. We propose a new conceptualization of brand activism, defined as values-based, controversial, focused on external communications, and driven by public interest. We also unpack factors that potentially shape consumers' perceptions of authenticity in brand activism activities—measurable action, brand-cause fit, and consistency. Furthermore, we explore consumers' responses to brand-activism acts and show that consumers generally rate these actions favorably. The study offers a comprehensive conceptualization of brand activism that is empirically substantiated and explicates factors shaping its perceived authenticity and consumer reactions. These findings advance current literature on brand activism and CSR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lou et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: