We offer a computational framework for modeling explanation as cooperative rational communication. Under our framework, when an explainer is faced with a "why?" question, they reason about the question-asker's current mental model, and intervene on that mental model in order to maximize the listener's future utility. We instantiate our framework in a planning domain, and show that our framework can model human explanations about plans across a wide variety of scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chandra et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: