Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Fissure sealants' (FSs) clinical success is closely tied to their proper application and ability to achieve good adhesion. Aim: The aim of the study was to determine whether bonding agents with co-curing / staged-curing were more effective at retaining various RBS in permanent teeth than those without co-curing / staged-curing. Materials and methods: 36 healthy extracted human premolars were selected and removed from debris/blood stains which were then mounted in acrylic resin with the buccal surface facing upward. The samples were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds and divided evenly into 2 groups I & II(n=18). Helioseal-F plus (group I) and Clinpro (group II). Each group was subsequently split into three subgroups, A, B and C (n=6). Subgroup A (No-bonding) was not received bonding agent. Prior to sealant application, subgroup B (Staged-curing) received bonding agent that had been cured. while subgroup C (Co-curing) received cured adhesive system after the application of sealant. Shear bond test was tested by using the universal testing machine. A post hoc Tukey test and ANOVA (analysis of variance) were used to analyse the data. Results: The results showed that the shear bond strength of group I (Subgroup IB) and group II (Subgroup IIB) which interact with Staged-curing was much greater than that of the other groups. Conclusion In comparison to No-bonding and Co-curing using a bonding agent as Staged-curing prior to the insertion of an RBS in permanent teeth increased SBS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jayatri et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: