In the 1970s, an unexpected transverse <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</a:mi></a:math> polarization in unpolarized proton-beryllium collisions was discovered, which initiated extensive studies on spin phenomena in high-energy physics. Over the past five decades, similar transverse <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><c:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</c:mi></c:math> polarization has been observed across various collision systems, including lepton-hadron deep-inelastic scattering, hadron-hadron collisions, and electron-positron collisions. Despite numerous promising theoretical models, the fundamental mechanism underlying this polarization phenomenon remains inconclusive to this day. However, in both longitudinally and transversely polarized lepton-hadron and hadron-hadron collisions, it is found that the <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><e:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</e:mi></e:math> hyperon is polarized with respect to the initial parton spin direction. How the <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><g:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</g:mi></g:math> hyperon acquires its spin has become one of the most crucial questions to address in order to resolve this puzzle. In this paper, I propose to use an exclusive process that can be measured at the Electron-Ion Collider, the deep exclusive meson production, to explicitly test the mechanism of <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><i:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</i:mi></i:math> polarization. The outcomes of this experimental measurement are anticipated to unveil the dominant mechanism by which <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><k:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</k:mi></k:math> obtains its spin, eliminating many of the ambiguities that have been encountered in previous studies. Finally, experimental challenges and requirements are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhoudunming Tu (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: