Loading of WS2 can greatly improve water splitting H2 generation efficiency of CdS in experiments. Here, we constructed WS2/CdS(100) and WS2/CdS(110) heterostructures with smaller mismatches and explored their interaction energy and band offset by first-principles calculations. Our calculation suggests that the WS2/CdS(100) interface with a stronger binding energy is more active in experiments, while the WS2/CdS(110) interface is metastable. The band alignment between CdS and WS2 is highly dependent on the orientation of the interfaces, and WS2/CdS(100) and WS2/CdS(110) belong to type-I and type-II band alignments, respectively. Therefore, a metal electrode and hole scavenger may be essential in experiments to help WS2/CdS(100) efficiently trap electrons, and a suitable substrate and an appropriate growth temperature are also needed to composite the CdS(110) surface to achieve a higher photocatalytic efficiency. In addition, we performed a detailed analysis of the macroscopic average potential and found that the calculated accuracy of potential difference across the heterostructures due to slab thickness is less than 80 meV at WS2/CdS interfaces. In total, our calculations not only explain the physical reasons for the increased efficiency of WS2/CdS, but also provide a detailed guideline for the design of a more efficient synergistic catalyst.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: