Scholars know that setting the right target, from the aggregated market to personalization, raises a cost-benefit trade-off, but we found little research on this topic. Personalization is very popular, but it may be costly. Using broader market segments can be affordable but less accurate. We did a simulation analysis in the tourism industry based on a case-study. We compared the profits of four different targets, aggregated market, large segments, micro-segments, individuals, in different conditions by varying consumers' attitudes, price, and scale/scope economies. Our findings show that micro-segmentation is the most profitable strategy on average, but the comparison strongly depends on the business conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gorgoglione et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: