Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of this study was to adapt the revised Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for Weight-Related Difficulties-Revised (AAQW-R) into Turkish language and examine its psychometric properties in a nonoverweight sample. This cross-sectional study included predominantly female individuals (83.2%), and mean age of the sample was 21.5. Final sample size included 161 university students. AAQW-R was translated into Turkish and translated back into English. Internal consistency levels for the total AAQW-R score and its subscales (i.e., food as control, weight as barrier to living, and weight stigma) were obtained for reliability. Measures of general experiential avoidance (AAQ-II), body anxiety (SPAS), dysfunctional eating attitudes (EAT-26), anxiety symptoms (GAD-7) and subjective happiness (SHS) were examined for convergent and divergent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine the factor structure of the scale. The three-factor structure model was a good fit to the data (χ2 [N = 161] = 81.27, p < .001, RMSEA = .098, 90% CI [.072, .124]). The Turkish version of AAQW-R and the subscales indicated a good level of internal consistency (α value ranging between .70 and .87). AAQW-R was found positively correlated with general experiential avoidance, dysfunctional eating attitudes and anxiety symptoms, indicating support for convergent validity. No relationship between AAQW-R and subjective happiness demonstrated evidence for divergent validity. Overall, the Turkish version of AAQW-R is valid and reliable tool to measure weight-related experiential avoidance in nonoverweight sample.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keskindağ et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: