Public Real Property (PRP) immovables are one of the most important building blocks of sustainable development. The process of utilization of these parcels in urban areas starts with the construction of zoning plans. These parcels gain different usage functions through zoning planning. One of these functions is Small Industrial Site (SIS) areas. SISs are established and served by the relevant cooperatives. In this context, if the immovable properties on which the SISs are to be established are on PRP parcels owned by the state, the ownership must first be transferred to the name of the relevant cooperative. This transfer of ownership takes place within the framework of specific legal procedures and principles. However, the legal legislation in force regarding this process contains some uncertainties and deficiencies and is insufficient. As a result, there may be cases where the work and transactions are interrupted. This situation leads to public and PRP losses. In this study, this process is analyzed in detail together with its actors. The process of utilization of PRP parcels as SIS areas is analyzed with concrete examples. A revision approach was introduced to the current legislation within the scope of these recommendations and the work/process flow was remodeled within the scope of the developed legislation. In this context, situations of uncertainty and deficiency were identified and a model of solution proposals was created. In this way, it has been determined that our study will eliminate the uncertainties and problems in this field, so that land management can be carried out more effectively and public / PRP losses can be prevented. In addition, our study is intended to be an appropriate process that can be used for the evaluation of PRP parcels planned as SISs in the zoning plan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sayar et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: