Max Liboiron and Josh Lepawsky start their latest book, Discard Studies: Wasting, Systems, and Power (2022), with an ordinary object that, though seemingly familiar, carries with it a web of invisible and unspoken relations.By exploring the toxic entanglements behind a discarded cash register receipt, Liboiron and Lepawsky take an unexpected path to ask how objects, people, communities, materials, and practices become valued or disposable.Throughout the book, the authors show how wasting is a technique of power and address the role of discarding in the construction and preservation of dominant structures.Discard studies emerged in 2010 as an interdisciplinary field of research initiated by Robin Nagle, founder of the Discard Studies online hub.Scholars in this field look at the why, what, where, and how of waste, and ask questions about the systems that shape and render things disposable.Even though Liboiron and Lepawsky state that they do not seek to provide an overview of the field, those unfamiliar with the discipline might find that the book offers a good introduction to it.In fact, through the introductory chapter the authors discuss some key discard studies concepts and present four methods used by discard studies scholars to debunk common myths about waste-namely, defamiliarization, denaturalization, decentering, and depurifying.Although these methods are often used to think about waste and trash, the authors show, through the theories expounded in subsequent chapters, that it is possible to use these approaches to think more widely about power, inequality, and justice.In chapter two, the authors lay out a theory of scale, discussing the unevenness in relationships within systems and defining scale as "relationships that matter" (45).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Natalia Espinel-Quintero (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: