Previous discussions of pointing have largely evaded a central question: How is an act of pointing even recognized as communicative in the first place? Here I argue—building on classic and recent work in pragmatics—that pointing is designed to deviate minimally from mere attending. This basic design is found throughout the diverse universe of human pointing¬—from the most familiar, conventional forms to the most exotic and ad hoc—and may even extend to cases of pointing in non-human animals. Further, I show that this framework lights up promising avenues for further research on the emergence of communicative forms on developmental, cultural, and evolutionary timescales.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kensy Cooperrider (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: