Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: The long-term outcomes of inebilizumab in participants from the N-MOmentum trial with a history of immunosuppressant therapy as compared to those without was evaluated. Methods: N-MOmentum (NCT02200770) was a 28-week randomized phase 2/3 trial of inebilizumab vs placebo, with an optional Open-Label Period (OLP) (>2 years). In this post hoc analysis, AQP4 + participants who received inebilizumab (through the OLP) were grouped by no history of immunosuppression therapy beyond treatment of acute NMOSD attacks (naïve), or prior azathioprine (AZA) and/or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy. Results: Among participants who received inebilizumab during the study, 94 received prior AZA/MMF and 103 were immunosuppressant naïve. Annualized relapse rate (95%CI) for participants with prior AZA/MMF was 0.11 (0.07, 0.17), compared to 0.08 (0.05, 0.14) for naïve. The hospitalization rate (annualized rate [95% CI]) for prior AZA/MMF was 0.15 (0.08, 0.27), and 0.12 (0.06, 0.22) for naïve. Participants with ≥1 study drug-related-treatment-emergent-adverse-event (TEAE) was 30.9% (29/94) in prior AZA/MMF and 46.6% (48/103) of naïve. Most adverse events were infection-related for both groups; 72.3% (68/94) for prior AZA/MMF and 77.7% (80/94) for naïve. Conclusions: This post hoc analysis evaluating long-term outcomes of inebilizumab in AQP4 + NMOSD participants treated with prior AZA/MMF therapy demonstrated a similar efficacy and safety profile as participants without prior immunosuppressant therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: