Background: Despite the utility of administrative health data, there remains a lack of patient-centered outcome measures to meaningfully capture morbidity after traumatic brain injury (TBI). We sought to characterize and validate days at home (DAH) as a feasible measure to assess population-level moderate to severe TBI (msTBI) outcomes and health resource utilization. Methods: We utilized linked health administrative data sources to identify adults with msTBI patients presenting to trauma centers in Ontario injured between 2009-2021. DAH at 180 days reflects the total number of days spent alive and at home excluding the days spent institutionalized in acute care, rehabilitation, inpatient mental health settings or post-acute readmissions. Construct and predictive validity were determined; we additionally estimated minimally important difference (MID) in DAH 180days . Results: There were 6340 patients that met inclusion criteria. Median DAH 180days were 70 days (interquartile range 0-144). Increased health resource utilization at baseline, older age, increasing cranial injury severity and major extracranial injuries were significantly associated with fewer DAH 180days . DAH 180days was correlated to DAH counts at 1-3 years. The average MID estimate from anchor-based and distribution-based methods was 18 days. Conclusions: We introduce DAH 180days as a feasible and sufficiently responsive patient-centered outcome measure with construct, predictive and face validity in an msTBI population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malhotra et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: