Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract Crystalline porous framework materials have attracted tremendous interest in electrocatalytic CO 2 reduction owing to their ordered structures and high specific surface areas as well as rich designability, however, still suffer from a lack of accuracy in regulating the binding strength between the catalytic sites and intermediates, which is crucial for optimizing the electrocatalytic activity and expanding the product types. Herein, we report three new kinds of vinylene‐linked metal‐covalent organic frameworks (TMT‐CH 3 ‐MCOF, TMP‐CH 3 ‐MCOF and TMP‐MCOF) with continuously tunable D‐π‐A interactions by adjusting the structure of the monomers at the molecular level for realizing efficient electroreduction of CO 2 to formate for the first time. Interestingly, compared with TMT‐CH 3 ‐MCOF and TMP‐MCOF, the TMP‐CH 3 ‐MCOF exhibited the highest HCOO − Faradaic efficiency (FE HCOO‐ ) of 95.6 % at −1.0 V vs RHE and displayed the FE HCOO‐ above 90 % at the voltage range of −1.0 to −1.2 V vs. RHE, which is one of the highest among various kinds of reported electrocatalysts. Theoretical calculations further reveal that the catalytic sites in TMP‐CH 3 ‐MCOF with unique moderate D‐π‐A interactions have suitable binding ability towards the reaction intermediate, which is beneficial for the formation of *HCOO and desorption of *HCOOH, thus effectively promoting the electroreduction of CO 2 to formate.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cui et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e68ab2b6db6435876128e7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202407298
Kai Cui
Shenyang Institute of Engineering
Zhao Zhang
Zhejiang Sci-Tech University
Congxu Wang
Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Lanzhou University
Xiangtan University
Westlake University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: