We used two numerical models, namely the CBwaves and SEOBNRE algorithms, based on the post-Newtonian and effective-one-body approaches for binary black holes evolving on eccentric orbits. We performed 20.000 new simulations for non-spinning and 240.000 simulations for aligned-spin configurations on a common grid of parameter values over the parameter space spanned by the mass ratio q≡ m₁/m₂∈[0.1,\,1], the gravitational mass mᵢ ∈ [10M_,\, 100M_] of each component labeled by i, the corresponding spin magnitude Sᵢ ∈ [0,\,0.6] and a constant initial orbital eccentricity e₀. A detailed investigation was conducted to ascertain whether there was a discrepancy in the waveforms generated by the two codes. This involved an in-depth analysis of the mismatch. Furthermore, an extensive comparison was carried out on the outlier points between the two codes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kacskovics et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: