BACKGROUND We recently identified three distinct Parkinson's disease subtypes: "motor only" (predominant motor deficits with intact cognition and psychiatric function); "psychiatric & motor" (prominent psychiatric symptoms and moderate motor deficits); "cognitive & motor" (cognitive and motor deficits). OBJECTIVE We used an independent cohort to replicate and assess reliability of these Parkinson disease subtypes. METHODS We tested our original subtype classification with an independent cohort (N=100) of Parkinson's disease participants without dementia and the same comprehensive evaluations assessing motor, cognitive, and psychiatric function. Next, we combined the original (N=162) and replication (N=100) datasets to test the classification model with the full combined dataset (N=262). We also generated 10 random split-half samples of the combined dataset to establish the reliability of the subtype classifications. Latent class analyses were applied to the replication, combined, and split-half samples to determine subtype classification. RESULTS First, LCA supported the three-class solution – Motor Only, Psychiatric & Motor, and Cognitive & Motor– in the replication sample. Next, using the larger, combined sample, LCA again supported the three subtype groups, with the emergence of a potential fourth group defined by more severe motor deficits. Finally, split-half analyses showed that the three-class model also had the best fit in 13/20 (65%) split-half samples; two-class and four-class solutions provided the best model fit in five (25%) and two (10%) split-half replications, respectively. CONCLUSIONS These results support the reproducibility and reliability of the Parkinson's disease behavioral subtypes of motor only, psychiatric & motor, and cognitive & motor groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cash et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: