Background Due to the risk of cerebral vascular injury, children and adolescents with high-risk sickle cell disease (SCD) experience neurocognitive decline over time. Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (HISCT) from human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling donors may slow or stop progression of neurocognitive changes. Objectives The study is to determine if HISCT can ameliorate SCD-associated neurocognitive changes and prevent neurocognitive progression, determine which specific areas of neurocognitive functioning are particularly vulnerable to SCD, and determine if there are age-related differences in neurocognitive functioning over time. Methods We performed neurocognitive and neuroimaging in SCD recipients following HISCT. Children and adolescents with high-risk SCD who received parental HISCT utilizing CD34 + enrichment and mononuclear cell (T-cell) addback following myeloimmunoablative conditioning received cognitive evaluations and neuroimaging at three time points: pre-transplant, 1 and 2 years post-transplant. Results Nineteen participants (13.1 ± 1.2 years [3.3–20.0]) received HISCT. At 2 years post-transplant, neuroimaging and cognitive function were stable. Regarding age-related differences pre-transplantation, older children (≥13 years) had already experienced significant decreases in language functioning ( p < 0.023), verbal intelligence quotient ( p < 0.05), non-verbal intelligence quotient ( p < 0.006), and processing speed ( p < 0.05), but normalized post-HISCT in all categories. Conclusion Thus, HISCT has the potential to ameliorate SCD-associated neurocognitive changes and prevent neurocognitive progression. Further studies are required to determine if neurocognitive performance remains stable beyond 2 years post-HISCT. Clinical trial registration: The study was conducted under an investigator IND (14359) (MSC) and registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01461837).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braniecki et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: