Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Leadership management has various benefits and advantages in the energy sector, such as improving energy sector development and obtaining sustainability benefits. However, the leadership management faces multiple challenges in the energy sector that must be evaluated and ranked. So, this study used the fusion multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology to assess and rank the challenges of leadership management in the energy sector. The WASPAS method is a fusion MCDM method used to rank the alternatives. Five experts are invited to evaluate the criteria and alternatives. Fourteen criteria and 13 alternatives were collected in this study. The results show that alternative 4 is the best and alternative 8 is the worst. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to show the stability of the alternatives' ranks. The sensitivity analysis was conducted in two parts. In the first part, the lambda value of WASPAS changed between 0 and 1. In the second part, 14 cases are introduced in criteria weights. The results show that the rank of alternatives is stable in different cases.
Alharbi et al. (Tue,) studied this question.