Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abstract Mw 7.8 and 7.5 strong earthquakes struck the Kahramanmaras province, southeastern Turkey on 6 February 2023. More than 50,000 and 8,400 lives were lost in Turkey and Syria, and approximately 230,000 buildings were destroyed or heavily damaged. 379 and 387 strong-motion stations in Turkey observed the Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.5 strong ground motions, nineteen and one of them recorded the east-west peak ground acceleration (PGA) larger than 500 cm/s², respectively. Referring to the building damage assessment map of 2023 Turkey earthquakes, we calculated the averaged damage ratio of 24 strong-motion stations with a circle of 100m in radius. Site effects in several specific southern Turkey cities may lead to a very irregular distribution of building damage. Based on the reinforced concrete (RC) analysis model of building damage probability created from the building damage data of the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake, we estimated the building damage probability of these southeast Turkey strong-motion stations. The optimal seismic vulnerability functions of residential RC buildings in southeast Turkey were obtained. The shear strength might be set to 60% of OLD-RC structure or 40% of NEW-RC structure in the Nagato-Kawase model for Kobe earthquake when build the building seismic damage probability model of southeastern Turkey.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: