The <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:mi>D</a:mi><a:msup><a:mi>D</a:mi><a:mo>*</a:mo></a:msup></a:math> scattering phase shifts in the <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:msubsup><c:mi>T</c:mi><c:mrow><c:mi>c</c:mi><c:mi>c</c:mi></c:mrow><c:mo>+</c:mo></c:msubsup><c:mo>=</c:mo><c:mi>c</c:mi><c:mi>c</c:mi><c:mover accent="true"><c:mi>u</c:mi><c:mo stretchy="false">¯</c:mo></c:mover><c:mover accent="true"><c:mi>d</c:mi><c:mo stretchy="false">¯</c:mo></c:mover></c:math> channel are extracted from lattice QCD for five different charm quark masses and a fixed light-quark mass corresponding to <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:msub><i:mi>m</i:mi><i:mi>π</i:mi></i:msub><i:mo>≃</i:mo><i:mn>280</i:mn><i:mtext> </i:mtext><i:mtext> </i:mtext><i:mi>MeV</i:mi></i:math>. The phase shifts are analyzed employing two approaches: effective range expansion and Lippmann-Schwinger equation derived in the effective field theory. In the latter case, the results imply an attraction at short range parametrized by contact terms and a slight repulsion at long range mediated by one-pion exchange with <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:msub><k:mi>m</k:mi><k:mi>π</k:mi></k:msub><k:mo>></k:mo><k:msub><k:mi>m</k:mi><k:msup><k:mi>D</k:mi><k:mo>*</k:mo></k:msup></k:msub><k:mo>−</k:mo><k:msub><k:mi>m</k:mi><k:mi>D</k:mi></k:msub></k:math>. The poles in the amplitude across the complex energy plane are extracted and their trajectories are discussed as the charm quark mass is varied. Two complex conjugate poles corresponding to a resonance below threshold are found for <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><m:msub><m:mi>m</m:mi><m:mi>c</m:mi></m:msub></m:math> close to the physical value. They turn into a pair of virtual states at the largest <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><o:msub><o:mi>m</o:mi><o:mi>c</o:mi></o:msub></o:math> studied. With further increasing <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><q:msub><q:mi>m</q:mi><q:mi>c</q:mi></q:msub></q:math>, one virtual pole representing <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><s:msubsup><s:mi>T</s:mi><s:mrow><s:mi>c</s:mi><s:mi>c</s:mi></s:mrow><s:mo>+</s:mo></s:msubsup></s:math> is expected to move towards the two-body threshold and turn into a bound state. The light-quark mass dependence of the <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><u:msubsup><u:mi>T</u:mi><u:mrow><u:mi>c</u:mi><u:mi>c</u:mi></u:mrow><u:mo>+</u:mo></u:msubsup></u:math> pole is briefly discussed using the data on <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><w:mi>D</w:mi><w:msup><w:mi>D</w:mi><w:mo>*</w:mo></w:msup></w:math> scattering from other lattice collaborations. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Collins et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: