The origin of the linear-in-temperature (<a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><a:mi>T</a:mi></a:math>-linear) resistivity in cuprate superconductors remains a profound mystery in condensed matter physics. Here, we investigate the dependence of the <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><b:mi>T</b:mi></b:math>-linear resistivity coefficient on doping, i.e., <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><c:mrow><c:msub><c:mi>A</c:mi><c:mn>1</c:mn></c:msub><c:mrow><c:mo>(</c:mo><c:mi>p</c:mi><c:mo>)</c:mo></c:mrow></c:mrow></c:math>, for three typical regions in the temperature versus doping phase diagram of hole-doped cuprates, from which the doping dependence of the scattering rate, i.e., <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><d:mrow><d:msub><d:mi>α</d:mi><d:mn>1</d:mn></d:msub><d:mrow><d:mo>(</d:mo><d:mi>p</d:mi><d:mo>)</d:mo></d:mrow></d:mrow></d:math>, is further derived. It is found that for region I (<e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><e:mrow><e:mi>p</e:mi><e:mo><</e:mo><e:msup><e:mi>p</e:mi><e:mo>*</e:mo></e:msup></e:mrow></e:math> and <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><f:mrow><f:mi>T</f:mi><f:mo>></f:mo><f:msup><f:mi>T</f:mi><f:mo>*</f:mo></f:msup></f:mrow></f:math>), <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><g:mrow><g:msub><g:mi>α</g:mi><g:mn>1</g:mn></g:msub><g:mrow><g:mo>(</g:mo><g:mi>p</g:mi><g:mo>)</g:mo></g:mrow></g:mrow></g:math> is almost a constant; for region II (<h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><h:mrow><h:mi>p</h:mi><h:mo>></h:mo><h:msup><h:mi>p</h:mi><h:mo>*</h:mo></h:msup></h:mrow></h:math> and <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><i:mrow><i:mi>T</i:mi><i:mo>></i:mo><i:msub><i:mi>T</i:mi><i:mi>coh</i:mi></i:msub></i:mrow></i:math>), <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><j:mrow><j:msub><j:mi>α</j:mi><j:mn>1</j:mn></j:msub><j:mrow><j:mo>(</j:mo><j:mi>p</j:mi><j:mo>)</j:mo></j:mrow><j:mo>∝</j:mo><j:mi>p</j:mi></j:mrow></j:math>; for region III (<k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><k:mrow><k:mi>p</k:mi><k:mo>></k:mo><k:msup><k:mi>p</k:mi><k:mo>*</k:mo></k:msup></k:mrow></k:math> and <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><l:mrow><l:mi>T</l:mi><l:mo><</l:mo><l:msub><l:mi>T</l:mi><l:mi>coh</l:mi></l:msub></l:mrow></l:math>), <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:mrow><m:msub><m:mi>α</m:mi><m:mn>1</m:mn></m:msub><m:mrow><m:mo>(</m:mo><m:mi>p</m:mi><m:mo>)</m:mo></m:mrow><m:mo>∝</m:mo><m:mi>p</m:mi><m:mrow><m:mo>(</m:mo><m:msub><m:mi>p</m:mi><m:mi>c</m:mi></m:msub><m:mo>−</m:mo><m:mi>p</m:mi><m:mo>)</m:mo></m:mrow></m:mrow></m:math>, where <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><n:msup><n:mi>T</n:mi><n:mo>*</n:mo></n:msup></n:math> is the onset temperature of the pseudogap phase, <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><o:msup><o:mi>p</o:mi><o:mo>*</o:mo></o:msup></o:math> indicates the doping at which <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><p:msup><p:mi>T</p:mi><p:mo>*</p:mo></p:msup></p:math> goes to zero, <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><q:msub><q:mi>T</q:mi><q:mi>coh</q:mi></q:msub></q:math> marks the onset of antinodal quasiparticle coherence, and <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><r:msub><r:mi>p</r:mi><r:mi mathvariant="normal">c</r:mi></r:msub></r:math> is the doping where the low-temperature linear behavior in the overdoped regime vanishes. Moreover, the deduced <t:math xmlns:t="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><t:mrow><t:msub><t:mi>α</t:mi><t:mn>1</t:mn></t:msub><t:mrow><t:mo>(</t:mo><t:mi>p</t:mi><t:mo>)</t:mo></t:mrow></t:mrow></t:math> relations are verified with the experimental data from previous reports. The discovered scattering rate versus doping relationship will shed light on the scattering mechanism underlying the <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><u:mi>T</u:mi></u:math>-linear resistivity in cuprate superconductors. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: