Abstract Purpose. There are more than 18 million cancer survivors in the US, with a projected increase of 24.4% over the next decade. Currently, little is known about the relationship between a cancer survivor’s caregiving responsibility and psychological distress. This study examines whether cancer-survivor caregivers experience increased psychological distress compared to cancer survivors without caregiving responsibilities. Methods. Data were drawn from the National Cancer Institute’s Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS5, Cycles 1 through 4, 2017–2020). The analytical sample includes 2,579 US cancer survivors (aged ≥65 years=50.5%, females=57.1%). Caregiving responsibility was self-reported, and psychological distress was assessed through the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4). Accounting for the complex design features of HINTS and jackknife replicate weights, a multivariable multinomial logistic regression model was fit to compute adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results. About 19.1% (n=377) of cancer survivors self-reported caregiving responsibilities. Overall, 19.3% (n=438) of cancer survivors had mild, and 10.9% (n=252) had moderate to severe psychological distress. Compared to cancer survivors with no caregiving responsibilities, caregivers had more than two-fold higher odds of experiencing mild (aOR=2.25; 95% CI: 1.17, 4.29), and moderate to severe (aOR=2.18; 95% CI: 1.07, 4.46) psychological distress. Conclusions. Our findings indicate that caregiving responsibilities among cancer survivors have a substantial adverse impact on their mental and emotional wellbeing. Implications for Cancer Survivors.Cancer-survivor caregivers are a distinct subgroup that navigates both survivorship and caregiving burdens at the same time. There is a need to identify and develop tailored interventions, programs, and resources for this vulnerable group of caregivers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmood et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: