This erratum addresses data errors in The Impact of Incidental Environmental Factors on Vote Choice: How Wind Speed is Related to More Prevention-Focused Voting. 1 While correcting these errors affects the magnitudes of our estimates of interest, none of the corrections change our primary research conclusion that wind speed is associated with voting decisions only in elections that pit a prevention-focused option against a promotion-focused option.The errors involve the weather-related control variables for Election 50 and the income data in Study 2, which focused on elections in Switzerland.These data errors stemmed from a mistake in the data merging process.Additionally, the cloud cover data should have been treated as a categorical variable rather than a continuous
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: