A gyrokinetic threshold model for pedestal width–height scaling prediction is applied to multiple devices. A shaping and aspect ratio scan is performed on National Spherical Torus Experiment (NSTX) equilibria, finding Δ ped = 0.92 A 1.04 κ − 1.24 0.38 δ β θ , ped 1.05 for the wide-pedestal branch with pedestal width Δ ped , aspect ratio A , elongation κ , triangularity δ , and normalized pedestal height β θ , ped . The width–transport scaling is found to vary significantly if the pedestal height is varied either with a fixed density or fixed temperature, showing how fueling and heating sources affect the pedestal density and temperature profiles for the kinetic-ballooning-mode (KBM) limited profiles. For an NSTX equilibrium, at fixed density, the wide branch is Δ ped = 0.028 ( q e / Γ e − 1.7 ) 1.5 ∼ η e 1.5 and at fixed temperature Δ ped = 0.31 ( q e / Γ e − 4.7 ) 0.85 ∼ η e 0.85 , where q e and Γ e are turbulent electron heat and particle fluxes and η e = ∇ ln T e / ∇ ln n e for an electron temperature T e and density n e . Pedestals close to the KBM limit are shown to have modified turbulent transport coefficients compared to the strongly driven KBMs. The role of flow shear is studied as a width–height scaling constraint and pedestal saturation mechanism for a standard and lithiated wide pedestal discharge. Finally, the stability, transport, and flow shear constraints are combined and examined for an NSTX experiment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parisi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: