first_page Download PDF settings Order Article Reprints Font Type: Arial Georgia Verdana Font Size: Aa Aa Aa Line Spacing: Column Width: Background: Open AccessAbstract In Search of Innovation, Sustainability and Digitalisation in the Education of Women Entrepreneurs: A Scientometric Analysis † by Jelena Jardas AntonićJelena Jardas Antonić SciProfiles Scilit Preprints.org Google Scholar *, Antonija SrokAntonija Srok SciProfiles Scilit Preprints.org Google Scholar and Ana Marija FilipasAna Marija Filipas SciProfiles Scilit Preprints.org Google Scholar Department of Quantitative Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. † Presented at the International Scientific Conference on Digitalization, Innovations & Sustainable Development: Trends and Business Perspectives, West Mishref, Kuwait, 29 November & 14 December 2023. Proceedings 2024, 101(1), 16; https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024101016 Published: 17 May 2024 Download keyboard_arrow_down Download PDF Download PDF with Cover Download XML Download Epub Versions Notes Keywords: entrepreneurship; women; education; innovation; sustainability; bibliometric analysis; literature review 1. IntroductionEducation plays an important role in fostering and developing entrepreneurship, building innovation skills and creating sustainable business solutions, thus promoting economic growth [1]. Digitalisation has facilitated access to education, business opportunities and market access [2,3]. Although women tend to be better educated, they are often disadvantaged in complex entrepreneurial environments [4,5]. Introducing gender-sensitive education can promote women's entrepreneurship and support gender equality [6,7]. We investigate how women's entrepreneurial education relates to digitalisation, innovation and sustainability using a scientometric approach. 2. MethodologyScientometrics uses comprehensive mathematical methods to quantify scientific research and describe scientific development. Relevant publications on women, entrepreneurship and education were extracted from the Web of Science database and further narrowed down to publications on innovation, sustainability and digitalisation. Various analyses were conducted to describe both qualitative and quantitative performance indicators in this research area. Appropriate visualisation techniques were used to graphically represent the relationships between the research components. 3. ResultsA total of 908 relevant publications published in the last 10 years were found, with an average of 12.78 citations per publication and a significant increase in the number of publications and citations in the last 3 years. The University of Southampton and England were cited most frequently. Pronounced keywords were gender, innovation and sustainability. Sustainability was the most cited journal, followed by several journals related to entrepreneurship and management, such as the International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. 4. ImplicationsThis review paper presents important work in the field that can be used for educational or research purposes to gain an understanding of the connections between the topics presented, provide practical examples or generally promote women's entrepreneurial education, with a focus on innovation and sustainability. The findings are primarily useful for researchers, but also for educators and managers interested in issues related to female entrepreneurship and education. 5. Originality ValueThe focus on the currently important and specific topics of innovation, sustainability and digitalisation in women's entrepreneurship education research sets our study apart from the existing literature. 6. ContributionGender equality and quality education are some of the most important Sustainable Development Goals. We contribute to existing research by quantitatively and qualitatively examining the main research components of existing research on innovation, sustainability and digitalisation in women's entrepreneurial education. With our contribution, we aim to advance research in this field to highlight women's potential in entrepreneurship, promote women's entrepreneurship and close the gender gap by addressing education in areas without gender-specific topics. Author ContributionsConceptualization, A.S. and J.J.A.; methodology, A.M.F.; validation, A.S., A.M.F. and J.J.A.; formal analysis, A.M.F.; investigation, A.M.F. and J.J.A.; resources, A.M.F. and J.J.A.; data curation, A.M.F. and J.J.A.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M.F. and J.J.A.; writing—review and editing, A.S., A.M.F. and J.J.A.; visualization, A.M.F.; supervision, J.J.A.; project administration, J.J.A.; funding acquisition, J.J.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.FundingThis research was funded by University of Rijeka, grant number ZIP-UNIRI-2023-14.Institutional Review Board StatementNot applicable.Informed Consent StatementNot applicable.Data Availability StatementData used in this study are available on the Web of Science Core Collection database. Conflicts of InterestThe authors declare no conflict of interest.ReferencesFerreras-Garcia, R.; Sales-Zaguirre, J.; Serradell-López, E. Sustainable Innovation in Higher Education: The Impact of Gender on Innovation Competences. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Molina-López, M.M.; Koller, M.R.T.; Rubio-Andrés, M.; González-Pérez, S. Never Too Late to Learn: How Education Helps Female Entrepreneurs at Overcoming Barriers in the Digital Economy. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Suseno, Y.; Abbott, L. Women Entrepreneurs' Digital Social Innovation: Linking Gender, Entrepreneurship, Social Innovation and Information Systems. Inf. Syst. J. 2021, 31, 717–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Elliott, C.; Mantler, J.; Huggins, J. Exploring the Gendered Entrepreneurial Identity Gap: Implications for Entrepreneurship Education. Int. J. Gend. Entrep. 2021, 13, 50–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Gawel, A. The Gender-Based Attainment of Education and Female Entrepreneurship: The European Perspective. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2021, 8, 403–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]Veckalne, R.; Tambovceva, T. The Importance of Gender Equality in Promoting Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Mark. Manag. Innov. 2023, 14, 158–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Wagstaff, M.F.; Hadjimarcou, J.; Chanoi, C. Gender Equality in International Business Education. J. Manag. Educ. 2020, 44, 605–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]Disclaimer/Publisher's Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. © 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Share and Cite MDPI and ACS Style Jardas Antonić, J.; Srok, A.; Filipas, A.M. In Search of Innovation, Sustainability and Digitalisation in the Education of Women Entrepreneurs: A Scientometric Analysis. Proceedings 2024, 101, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024101016 AMA Style Jardas Antonić J, Srok A, Filipas AM. In Search of Innovation, Sustainability and Digitalisation in the Education of Women Entrepreneurs: A Scientometric Analysis. Proceedings. 2024; 101(1):16. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024101016 Chicago/Turabian Style Jardas Antonić, Jelena, Antonija Srok, and Ana Marija Filipas. 2024. "In Search of Innovation, Sustainability and Digitalisation in the Education of Women Entrepreneurs: A Scientometric Analysis" Proceedings 101, no. 1: 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2024101016 Article Metrics No No Article Access Statistics Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Antonić et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: