In Africa, the use of mobile terminals is part of the tools facilitating the exchange of data and the transportation of information in many fields. However, counterfeit terminals have adverse consequences on the health of users, the economy, and telecommunication networks. They represent approximately 20% of the global market, causing economic losses, copyright infringements, and issues for telecommunication network operators. Indeed, combating counterfeiting requires strengthening existing instruments and increased financial support. Governments must collaborate more actively in finding solutions for the proper management of illicit mobile terminals, given the consequences these devices can have on environmental and public safety aspects. The rigorous enforcement of intellectual property laws is crucial, and international collaboration is necessary for effective management of this issue. The management of mobile terminals requires not only a framework for consultation but also the establishment of a management system integrating a Smart Database (SD). This database, connected to the Central Equipment Identify Register (CEIR) of each country, forms a Smart Database Management System (SDMS) regulated by authorities. Each SDMS collects data related to International Mobile Equipment Identify (IMEI) of mobile terminals via encrypted Quick Response codes (QR). Through the analysis of these codes, the system displays information about licit or illicit terminals and compares them with the GSM Association (GSMA) database to classify them into two distinct lists. These measures will enable the authorities of each country, through their regulatory bodies, to control licit and illicit mobile terminals circulating in African countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ndiaye et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: