Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background The current study is a case study of a Māori (Indigenous people of New Zealand) organisation and their developmental processes in creating a kaumātua (older people) housing village for health and social wellbeing. This study identifies how a set of established co-design and culturally-centred principles were enacted when creating and developing the village. Method A mixed-method concurrent design was used in creating the case with interviews ( n = 4), focus groups ( N = 4 with 16 total participants) and survey questionnaires ( n = 56) involving kaumātua and organisation members. Results Survey results illustrate that suitable and affordable housing are associated with self-rated health, loneliness, and life satisfaction. The primary purpose of the housing village was to enable kaumātua to be connected to the marae (community meeting house) as part of a larger vision of developing intergenerational housing around the marae to enhance wellbeing. Further, key themes around visioning, collaborative team and funding, leadership, fit-for-purpose design, and tenancy management were grounded in cultural elements using te ao Māori (Māori worldview). Conclusion This case study illustrates several co-design and culturally-centred principles from a previously developed toolkit that supported the project. This case study demonstrates how one community enacted these principles to provide the ground for developing a housing project that meets the health and social wellbeing of kaumātua.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oetzel et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: