Clinical evaluation shows the SECONDs scale is valid and reliable for assessing disorders of consciousness, indicating utility in rehabilitation settings.
Background: The Coma Recovery Scale–Revised (CRS-R) is the gold standard for diagnosing chronic disorders of consciousness (DoC); however, its clinical utility is limited by lengthy administration and the need for specialized training. The Simplified Evaluation of Disorders of Consciousness (SECONDs) provides a faster and more user-friendly alternative. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Argentine adaptation of the SECONDs scale in adults with chronic DoC due to acquired brain injury. Methods: Twenty-nine patients were evaluated over two consecutive days by three blinded raters. On day one, rater A administered the SECONDs (A1) and rater B administered the CRS-R (B) to assess concurrent validity. On day two, rater A repeated the SECONDs (A2), and rater C performed an additional SECONDs assessment (C), permitting evaluation of intra-rater (A1 vs. A2) and inter-rater (A vs. C) reliability. Results: The SECONDs demonstrated excellent intra-rater (ICC = 0.98) and inter-rater (ICC = 0.86) reliability. Concurrent validity with the CRS-R was strong (r = 0.73, p < 0.001). Diagnostic agreement was high between A1 and B (κ = 0.75) and between both A1-A2 and A1-C (κ = 0.82). The median administration time was significantly shorter for the SECONDs (10 vs. 15 min; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The Argentine SECONDs is a valid, reliable, and efficient tool for the clinical assessment of DoC patients in rehabilitation settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Russo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: