participating in a project to develop ethical guidelines for this publisher.This work is, of course, both interesting and important, especially since the world of scientific writing and publishing has recently perhaps transformed.Chat-GPT not only changed how we approach examinations in education but also opened up new opportunities and risks in the research process.Large language models (LLMs) promise to be of tremendous help in the work of research.An often-used example is how AI helped solve the protein folding problem that biochemists have worked on for over 50 years.However, using AI also comes with risks that can put rather severe stress on standard approaches to publishing ethics. 1 Examples could range from publishing AI hallucinations as scientific facts via new forms of plagiarism to an even stronger pressure to publish or perish, with attendant so-called salami publishing as a result. 2 Indeed, recently, the Vancouver Principles for publishing ethics were revised to take these developments into account.The following are now the principles for regulating who will count as an
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lars Lindblom (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: